120 Jubilees

Two Tassels Ministry
Wayne L. Atchison
(pen name)
Christian Technical Notes

-- Updated February 1, 2016 --

 Home Page 

Articles/Papers Written By Wayne L. Atchison

 For the Full List of Articles, Click Here 

You may or may not agree with points made in my articles. Disagreement is expected, and even welcome.
What is more important is that you read and understand the basis and reasoning for the points made.

The first goal is to challenge you:
If you read the best arguments I can make, and understand them well enough to give a logical rebuttal, then you have grown in your understanding.

The second goal is to convince you: If you read the best arguments I can make, and understand them well enough to see that your current concepts may have some problems, then you have grown in your understanding.

An honest Bible study and a focused debate should be fun. Please enjoy reading the best arguments I can make ...

Articles On Foundational Topics: "What You Need To Know":

There are just a few concepts that everyone needs to understand first.
We may all enjoy engaging in fun debates about many Biblical topics, but these three must be debated first.
The First Most Important Thing To Know:
Diving deep into the Greek Text of 2-Timothy 2:19-26 demonstrates the purpose for living. The Reason For Living
The Kingdom of YHWH - The Reason For Living: An Inspiring Visual Presentation.

(This is a YouTube Movie, it is Well Worth Seeing)
YouTube Presentation
The Second Most Important Thing To Know:
The "Law versus Grace" Issue Continues.
Can both sides be "right" and "wrong" at the same time?

The Melchizedek Priesthood is the answer!
Law Versus Grace
(clarified in 2 Pages)
Diving deep into the Greek Text of Matthrew 5:17-20 demonstrates that these verses are mistranslated. The Messiah said NOT to think that He was going to annul the Law. In the Greek Text this is very emphatic! The Laws Are Not Done Away
Amazing historical documentation of the very first split of the original church at Jerusalem.
It was a "departing from the religion", to follow the religion of the Romans instead of the religion of the Jews.
First Split
The Third Most Important Thing To Know:
Diving into the Greek Text of Acts 15:21 demonstrates why Galatians had to be written. It has nothing to do with the Torah-of-YHWH (translated: Teachings-of-Yahowah, Aramaic) being changed, it has everything to do with Yahowah changing men to be Clean, so that He can dwell in them.
     This is a VERY Important Paper.
The End of Man's Uncleanliness
"The Beast with Seven Heads and You":
The Worship of The Beast of Revelation 13 is "All Around You" !

The Beast is not a man. The Beast has Seven Heads ! The Beast is the pervasive worldwide system of the Seven "Schools of Thought" of The Great Dragon, the Adversary of YHWH.

The names, titles, and symbols we see around us are meant to tell us something. We see symbols on church buildings, and we sing songs using special names and titles. If you do not know what a name, title or a symbol really means, then you cannot be forewarned. By having a high level understanding of the names, titles, and symbols used to signal the worship of The Great Dragon and his Priesthood, you can be forewarned that something around you is just not right. Ultimately you must understand what "The Lie" is.

This is historical and technical research, presented in layman's terms.
This Book Presentation is current, unique, insightful, and very astonishing.
You have never seen this information presented before!

Get 'The Beast with Seven Heads and You' on Amazon
Click to Preview
"The Beast with Seven Heads and You"

Papers On "One God":

"One God": Means the Creator YHWH is a Singular Being, One Person having One Intellect, The only Elohim of Israel,
The Father, who resurrected 'the Jesus', the promised Messiah.
People like to think that God is a Trinity, or a Family of separate Personalities.

But the Hebrew Text of Deuteronomy 6:4 does NOT say that "God is one", it says that: "YHWH is '1'" !

Read it in the Hebrew Text:  "YHWH, our Elohim, YHWH is '1'".

When the Messiah Yahoshua (Aramaic, Greek 'Ieesous', English 'Jesus') quoted this Text, the Greek word for the cardinal number '1' ('heis') was used.
In the Greek Text Yahoshua said that the Hebrew word "one" means the digit "1".

Nowhere in the Greek Text are we told that we must believe in a Trinity, nor that we must believe that the Jesus preexisted as God.
These are man-made-up tenets, such confessions are not in the Greek Text. This fact is documented without ambiguity in the historical records of the Nicean Council in 325 AD. Not until that conference was it officially decreed that "everyone must confess that Jesus is God".
Today, people are just simply unaware that they are mindlessly parroting a tenet of faith, that was invented by men 300 years after the New Covenant began.

To be saved we are told that we must believe that the man Yahoshua is the resurrected son of God, and is both the promised Prophet (2nd Moses) and the promised Messiah (2nd Adam). Therefore, it is not proper to elevate this topic to the level of condemnation to hell, if you agree or disagree.
But at the same time, this topic will never just go away, so let us talk about it.

Consider carefully. What is the first and firmest tenet of the Jewish religion? The one-ness of God. One Being and one Personality.
How inconsistent it is to claim to worship the God of Israel, but reject the first and firmest tenet of the Hebrew Text.

But can people define the word "God" to be anything they want? Well, Yes. The word "God" is just a generalized title. It is not really a specific name of anybody or anything. It is a title, like Lord Smith. The title "God" can be used for anyone from a movie star to an ancient idol. Thus, by using only the title-word "God", people can read the scriptures with whatever definition of "God" they want.

Likewise, people will debate the meaning of the Hebrew word 'Elohim', which is often translated into English as the word "God". In these debates people suggest that the word 'Elohim' is a uni-plural, or is a Trinity, or implies more than one Member. The problem is that people can intellectually imagine that 'God/Elohim' may be like 'this', or that 'God/Elohim' may be like 'that'. Understand why: 'Elohim' is also a 'Title'. Anyone of high status is called an 'Elohim' in the Hebrew Text. Angels, Magistrates, Judges, Moses himself, "the false gods"; these are all called 'Elohim'.

The fact is that 'God/Elohim' is used to refer to human rulers (Ex. 21:6, Ps. 82:6, Jn. 10:34-36); pagan gods (Ex. 18:11; Ps. 88:8; 1 Sam. 5:7; 2 Kg. 18:34); angels (Ps. 8:5; 97:7); a man [Moses] as a god (Ex. 7:1); and to YHWH Himself. The word 'Elohim' is used just like a title of nobility, designating the person's or the god's very high social class and elevated status. Titles are given to people today too. Mr. Smith becomes Sir Smith or Lord Smith.
Thus, debating the Hebrew word 'Elohim' is pointless.

The debate is NOT about the English word 'God', nor is it about the Hebrew word 'Elohim', it is about the Hebrew word 'YHWH':

The Text does not say that "God is one", it says that "YHWH Is '1'"

Imagine whatever you want about the word 'God/Elohim'. But it is impossible to imagine that the personal name of the Creator-Being, 'YHWH', which is used over 6,820 times in the Hebrew Text with the SINGULAR PRONOUN (He, I, His, etc.), is referring to anything but a single Being, having one intellect and one personality.

This fact makes Acts 3:13 contradict the typical Trinitarian and "Jesus is YHWH" concepts. This chapter says that it was the entity "YHWH" that resurrected "The Jesus", and that it is "The Jesus" that is the surviving entity (not "The Christ") of the resurrection.

There is another point which needs to be understood:
There is no doubt that the King James version, and most of the other translations of the Greek Text, use language which leads the reader into thinking that Jesus preexisted as God. Further, there is no doubt that those creating these English translations are indeed highly skilled scholars, and they know the Greek language. This means that the debate is in essence a challenge to their translation. At some point the debate must focus on the Greek Text itself, and investigate how else the Text can be translated.

My first clue of this was that in the Middle Ages, before the printing press, the Jewish scholars would read the Greek Text for the purpose of debating the Catholic scholars. In doing so they would declare to the Catholic scholars that no where in the Greek Text does it say that Jesus preexisted, or was/is 'Divine'. For the Jewish scholars to say this, they had to be reading the Greek Text and translating it differently.

Saying the above another way: if as a cosmic-fact Jesus is not a preexistent personality of the Godhead, but rather was a man which began existence at birth, then it should be possible for an honest person to translate the exact same Greek Text in a manner which is mono-theistic, as the Jewish scholars asserted. It should be possible to read the Greek Text and stay consistent with the first and firmest tenet of the Hebrew Text.

This is the approach I have taken. Each of the proof-texts supporting the preexistence of Jesus must be examined honestly, to determine if they could indeed be translated differently. What I have discovered, and the articles/papers presented will document, is that indeed each of these proof-texts are rendered into English in a biased manner. Each Text can grammatically and honestly be rendered into English such that a preexistent Jesus is not implied. As it turns out, most of the proof-texts actually say the opposite.

I suggest that it is very important to ponder Christology in two parts:
First you ask yourself - what IF the Messiah and YHWH are the same - then how would the author had written the Greek Text, with the proper grammar, to be consistent with that understanding?

Then you again ask yourself - what IF the Messiah and YHWH are not the same - then how would the author had written the Greek Text, with the proper grammar, to be consistent with that understanding?

Then you look at the Text as it was written, and ask yourself - is the Greek Text, with the grammar used, written more consistent with 'this' or with 'that' understanding?

I have found that in every case the Greek Text, with its grammar, is more consistent with the understanding that it is YHWH which is One ('1'), and it is His Messiah, 'the Jesus', that was born of the DNA of Abraham, that un-did the curse of Adam, and is our hero, and is our coming King for the millennium. 1-Corinthians 15 tells us that after the millennium 'the Jesus' will hand over the reigns to 'the Father', also giving evidence that 'the Messiah, the Jesus' is not the same being as is 'the YHWH'.

The following papers present the details which document my best arguments in support of worshipping only The Creator YHWH, the only Elohim of Israel, through the Mediator who is the resurrected Yahoshua (Jesus), the Messiah.
What The Word For "God" Meant To People In Ancient Times
Historical documents demonstrate how the word 'Elohim/God' was used in ancient times. Documents found in other languages, such as Egyptian and Sumerian, as well as the Hebrew Text itself, all demonstrate that anyone could be voted or elevated to be an 'Elohim'.
Understanding that this debate is NOT about the Hebrew word 'Elohim' is foundational.

It is very important that you read this paper first!
Ancient Usage Of
The Word 'Elohim/God'

The Shema as defined by the Hebrew Text, Deut. 6:4-5:
"Hear O'Isreal, Yahowah our Elohim, Yahowah IS 1
And you shall love Yahowah your Elohim,
With all of your Heart,
And with all of your Soul,
And with all of your Might."

[ The New Covenant Text allows us to add ]
In Yahoshua's Name, So Let It Be So !

The research shows why 'YHWH' was (is) pronouned as three syllables, 'Yaho-wah'.
The research shows why 'Elohim' is NOT just another name for 'God', and how this word was actually used in ancient times.
The research shows why the Hebrew word is the digit '1' (and there really is no ambiguity on this).
The research shows why the Messiah is also called 'Yaho-shua'.
Step by Step Grammatical Analysis of John 1:1-14
The most often quoted verse to support the Trinity, actually says the opposite.
You need to read the historical record of how these versus were translated before 325 AD.
You need to read the official Footnotes of the Trinitarian translators.
The facts are that the Greek Grammar, the translator's footnotes, and the historical records demonstrate that these verses are being purposefully mistranslated.

Seems no one wants to tell you that John 1 is directly written from Proverbs chapter 8. Just read chapter 8, and you will understand what John is talking about. John 1 has nothing to do with introducing new scripture about a preexistent Jesus, but is talking about "Wisdom".
"Doth not wisdom cry? and understanding put forth her voice? She standeth in the top of high places, by the way in the places of the paths. She crieth at the gates, at the . . . (22) The Lord possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old. I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was. When there were no depths, I was brought forth; when there were no fountains abounding with water. Before the mountains were settled, before the hills was I brought forth: While as yet he had not made the earth, nor the fields, nor the highest part of the dust of the world. When he prepared the heavens, I was there: when he set a compass upon the face of the depth: When he established the clouds above: when he strengthened the fountains of the deep: When he gave to the sea his decree, that the waters should not pass his commandment: when he appointed the foundations of the earth: Then I was by him, as one brought up with him: and I was daily his delight, rejoicing always before him; Rejoicing in the habitable part of his earth; and my delights were with the sons of men. Now therefore hearken unto me, O ye children: for blessed are they that keep my ways." (Proverbs 8:1, 22-32).
John 1:1-14
Step by Step Grammatical Analysis of Colossians 1:14-16:
Diving into the Greek Text demonstrates that these verses are translated to lead the reading into thinking what is not there.
It does not say that the Messiah created everything, it says that the Messiah passively received every power and authority from the Father.
Colossians 1:15-16
Step by Step Grammatical Analysis of "The Christian Confession" of 1-John 4:2
Diving into the Greek Text demonstrates that these verses are translated in such a way as to hide the seriousness of the confession.
This Article Is Vital !
The Biblical Confession is far more serious than what is expressed in the Catholic/Protestant Bibles !
Most people have been taught things which directly contradict the original confession.
1-John 4:2
Step by Step Grammatical Analysis of John 17:5
Diving into the Greek Text demonstrates that this verse is seriously mistranslated.
This verse may be the most blatantly (done on purpose) mistranslated verse in the Bible!

This verse does not say that Jesus preexisted before the world (the creation) began.
It says that He was asking The Father to retain the same superior status which He already had with the Father, even after the resurrection, a status of glory superior to that of the world.

"Therefore, at this time it is urgant that You glorify Me, You Father in Your presence, so that the glorified status which I have-had is superior to the superiority the world has in Your presence."
John 17:5
King of Kings and Lord of Lords
Discussion about Revelation 19:11-16 and 1-Timothy 6:13-16.
Do these versus combine to tell us that 'the Messiah' and 'the YHWH' have the same title, and therefore are the same person?
Revelation 19
They Say: "God Had To Die":
They say that no human, even if considered to be a perfect sacrifice, could ever die for more than themselves. They say that the only way that Yahoshua's sacrifice could atone for all of mankind, is that Yahoshua's death had to be worth more than all of mankind. Therefore, Yahoshua had to be God, or else His death would not be worth enough.
But this premise is not in the Bible!
God Did Not
Have To Die
They Say: "God Is A Family of Divine Beings":
They say that God is a Family of Divine Beings, having Members of "God The Father" and "Jesus Christ".
They say that the God of Israel, YHWH, came from the heavenly realm, down to earth to become a man, Jesus.
They say that Jesus came to reveal the previously unknown God, "God The Father".
They say that it was this unknown God, "God The Father", that raised Jesus from the dead.
But where is the Text that says anyone else but YHWH is "God The Father"?
But where is the Text that says anyone else but YHWH is a Divine Being, that we are to worship?
YHWH Did Not
Become Jesus
They Say: "Thomas Called Jesus God":
They say that in John 20:28 Thomas said "my Lord and my God".
They say this then shows that Jesus is also God too.
But reading what Thomas said, and then making this conclusion, is not correct. Read Why.?
Jesus Was Not
Called God

Papers On "The Promised Messiah":

"The Promised Messiah": Means that YHWH promised Abraham that a man of his own seed (DNA)
would undo what Adam and Eve did.
Yahoshua Was Born As The Parthian King Of The Jews:
Significant historical evidence demonstrating that the Messiah was a highly educated Rabbi, an esteemed Priest of the order of Melchizedek, having very high social status. The more you understand their honor/shame culture, the more you understand how the Greek Text is telling you that Yahoshua was a very high ranking leader. Yahoshua The Parthian King

Papers On "Miscellaneous Topics":

The Solar System Is A Witnesses To The Creator:
The five major planets (Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn) each have their own unique orbit around the sun. Their orbits do not even follow the same plane, and each travels at a different speed. Even so, the time it takes each planet to circle once around the sun is a value that modern science has measured with incredible accuracy. Now, if we add their orbits together, what do we get?

A planet's sidereal cycle is the time it takes the planet to circle once around the sun, where the start and finish point is the same. If you simply add the time it takes each planet to make (7 times 7) 49 laps around the sun, you arrive at 2,160 years, which is one astronomical age.

This mathematical fact is far beyond the possibility of being a result of "random chance".
Read the explanation.
Proof There Is A Creator
Corporate versus Independent Thinking:
We observe that the Body of Christ is extremely fragmented into thousands of groups.
There are "Churches of God", "Messianic Groups", "Congregations of YHWH", and many more.
Is there anyone thinking about Why?
Is there anyone thinking about Why Splits Happen So Often?
Is there anyone thinking about Why Their Own Group Has Such Problems?
Is there anyone thinking about trying to form Group Cooperations?
Is there anyone thinking about forming an End Time Community?

If "YES", then you absolutely need to read this paper.
Corporate versus Independent Thinking'
The Observed Calendar of the Second Temple, Dates For 2016:
The historical documentation demonstrates that after circa 516 B.C. their was one official lunar calendar system used throughout the region of Asia Minor. This would be from India to Ethiopia. This same lunar calendar was taught by the academies, and used by their graduating scribes to record historical events and legal contracts. This simple lunar calendar was the only official calendar used during the Second Temple Era started by Ezra. Historical documents exist which demonstrate that this same lunar calendar was kept scrupulously, all of the way up to circa 163 A.D. Only at this late date do we start to find documents which demonstrate a "rift" beginning between the academies of the east (Persia / Parthia) and the Rabbinical Rabbis of the west.

Using the same rules of this simple lunar calendar, these are the important (calculated, not observed yet) dates for 2016.
Dates For 2016
The Observed Calendar of the Second Temple, Dates For 2015:
Using the same rules of this simple lunar calendar, these are the important (calculated, not observed yet) dates for 2015. Dates For 2015
Lunar Calendar of the Second Temple Era:
Diving deep into the Historical Records, there are scores of eye witness quotes and astronomical data points, which tell us today exactly how the priests of the Second Temple determined their official calendar, which they used to declare the Holy Days and Temple duties of YHWH.

This link will take you to a huge amount of material. To really know about the ancient lunar calendar used by Israel, you will want to read this material.
The Lunar Calendar of the Second Temple Era

Records Showing Hillel II Calendar Did Not Exist Before 350 AD
Is a Day from Sunset-to-Sunset, or from Sunrise-to-Sunrise?
Often Calendar Studies become confused because of mixing the two definitions of a Day ("Yoom"), within the same context. The task is to keep separate the difference between a three parts per Day "Yoom", from a Lunar Calendar Day "Yoom". The Ancient Hebrews Had
Two "Yooms"
Early Christian Church's Very First Split:
Amazing historical documentation of the very first split of the original church at Jerusalem.
It was a "departing from the religion", to follow the religion of the Romans instead of the religion of the Jews.
This short paper is like dynamite against the established Christianity.
First Split
Analysis of the Sabbath - Sunday Controversy:
The historical documentation demonstrates that throughout history
the Saturday-Sabbath has always been the primary day to worship YHWH (Yahowah in Aramaic),
while Sunday has always been the primary day to worship the other Gods (the other Elohims).
This paper contains many quotes, directly from the Catholic and Protestant denominations, saying this very same thing.
Read this paper, and you will be absolutely astonished at what is known to be true by those that keep Sunday.
The Seventh Day Sabbath
Step by Step Grammatical Analysis of Colossians 2:16-17:
Most Sunday Churches teach that: "The Sabbath, New Moons, and Holy Days: are only a shadow, but the reality is Christ", therefore you do not have to keep them. They then tell you that you should keep Sunday instead. But the Greek Grammar demonstrates that these verses are mistranslated. We keep Yahowah's Sabbaths, New Moons, and Holy Days because that is what the Messiah (Yahoshua) is doing right now ! Colossians 2:16
The Passover Controversy Resolved By the Historical Evidence:
Diving deep into the Passover chronology, looking at the Historical References and the Greek Text, reveals that there are no ambiguities in the Hebrew or Greek accounts. The Passover Controversy
Chronology of Herod:
A fully coordinated chart showing the significant events of both Herod and The Messiah, from 64 B.C. to 70 A.D. Chronology of Herod (HTML)
The Adulterous Woman:
Many in Christendom want you to think that Jesus was writing into the earth a list of various sins that people do commonly. That is, we all sin somehow, and Jesus knew exactly how to itemize a good summary list of them, so that no one is ever left standing to cast a first stone at anyone else. But this interpretation is not correct, here is why. The Adulterous Woman
Is YHWH the Harsh-God of the Old Testament?
Many readers of the Bible perceive that the Old Testament contains countless verses describing an angry revengeful God who is about to slay the wicked, punish the idolater, and wipe out entire towns for their evil deeds. Many in Christendom are told that the God of the Jews is a harsh judgmental God, full of rage, pouring out wrath, revenge, and vengeance.

But this characterization of Yahowah is not correct.
YHWH Is Not a Harsh-God
(4 Pages)

The "Blood Moons"

(mostly a lot of 'Hype', except for the one on 09/28/2015)

Analysis Of The 2014 and 2015 Eclipses:

Local Time
Lunar Date
2014/04/15 01:37
Full Lunar Eclipse
01/15 (or 16th?)
near midnight, 'IS Visible'
2014/04/15 09:38
Full Lunar Eclipse
01/15 (or 16th?)
after sunrise, NOT Visible
2014/10/08 04:38
Full Lunar Eclipse
07/13 (or 14th?)
still morning, 'IS Visible'
2014/10/08 12:38
Full Lunar Eclipse
07/13 (or 14th?)
near noon, NOT Visible
2015/03/20 03:00
Upper-Third Solar Eclipse
after noon, 'IS Visible'
Jerusalem: YES
2015/03/20 11:30
Upper-Third Solar Eclipse
near noon, 'IS Visible'
2015/04/04 06:00
Full Lunar Eclipse
01/14 (or 15th?)
just before sunrise, 'IS Visible'
2015/04/04 14:00
Full Lunar Eclipse
01/14 (or 15th?)
in the after noon, NOT Visible
2015/09/13 00:00
unseeable Solar Eclipse
06/28 (or 29th?)
after noon, NOT Visible
2015/09/13 07:00
unseeable Solar Eclipse
06/28 (or 29th?)
morning, NOT Visible
2015/09/27 20:50
Full Lunar Eclipse
after sundown, 'IS Visible'
Jerusalem: YES
2015/09/28 04:50
Full Lunar Eclipse
07/14 (possibly 13th if miss the very thin new crescent so have 30 days previous month?)
Before Sunrise, 'IS Visible'
Low In Western Horizon so it Could Appear 'RED'
Moon Is At Exact Epigee, So It Is A Supermoon!

Conclusion: Only Two Eclipses Are Visible From Jerusalem